CCDAS
by Wolfgang
Knorr and Peter Cox
CAMELS is an EU funded project on "Carbon
Assimilation and Modelling of the European Land Surface", forming part
of the CarboEurope cluster of projects. The
aims of CAMELS are to produce:
- best estimates and
uncertainty bounds for the contemporary and historical land carbon
sinks in Europe and elsewhere, isolating the effects of direct
land-management.
- a prototype carbon cycle
data assimilation system (CCDAS) exploiting existing data sources (e.g. flux measurements, carbon inventory data,
satellite products) and the latest terrestrial ecosystem models (TEMs),
in order to produce operational estimates of "Kyoto sinks".
It is designed to address important
questions concerning the global and European carbon cycle from a
combined data and modelling point of view. As one of the CarboEurope
projects starting towards the end of the 5th Framework
Programme, it capitalizes on the rich data findings of the project
cluster by integration into a consistent modelling framework, using
several European state-of-the-art ecosystem models. Scientific questions
addressed include:
· Where are the current carbon
sources and sinks located on the land and do European sinks compare with
sinks of other large continental areas?
· Why do these sources and
sinks exist, i.e. what are the relative contributions of CO2
fertilisation, nitrogen deposition, climate variability, land management
and land-use change?
·
How
could we make optimal use of existing data sources and the latest
models to produce operational estimates of the European land carbon
sink?
The first question has up to now been
addressed by two major approaches, one with a bottom-up, and another
with a top-down view. Bottom-up modelling uses data from the field and
basic process understanding in carbon cycle and plant physiology to
compute CO2 fluxes between the land and the atmosphere. The
top-down approach uses atmospheric measurements in combination with an
inverse atmospheric transport model to infer the same quantity. In
addition, CarboEurope and other international projects have created a
wealth of information on locally measured CO2 and water
exchange fluxes at the stand level.
The advantage of the top-down, atmospheric
inversion approach is that it relatively little prior information on
flux patterns enters the calculation (but biosphere model results are
often used to generate prior, "first guess" fluxes), and that it works
on large scales. Its main disadvantage is relevant to the second
question above: there is no information gained concerning processes. The
advantages of the bottom-up approach are complementary: it can make use
of process knowledge, is thus able to distinguish between natural and
management effects (required under the Kyoto protocol, for example), and
can be used prognostically. Its disadvantages: it is often uncertain,
there are large data gaps, and it cannot make optimal use of
large-scale constraints.
CAMELS uses a novel approach, termed
Carbon Cycle Data Assimilation System (CCDAS), that combines both views
and adds a few additional elements. An additional innovation is that
CAMELS produces consistent uncertainty bounds on carbon fluxes that are
essential for policy purposes. It starts from flux measurements at the
stand scale, which are used to improve and best parameterise a number of
ecosystem models. The exercise also yields uncertainty bounds for
ecosystem model parameters, and, by using data from all major biomes, a
notion of the representativeness of the models and parameterisations.
The assumption used in CAMELS is that the
best way to spatially extrapolate the results from the flux measurements
is not through fluxes, but through parameter values that describe the
underlying processes. Hence, the parameter values optimised from the
site data are used as a priori values in a global carbon
cycle data assimilation system (CCDAS). CAMELS has so far produced one
prototype CCDAS based on the ecosystem model BETHY: in a first data
assimilation step, BETHY takes satellite-observed values of "greenness"
to optimise parameters related to water status, phenology, and total
plant cover. Next, the adjoint (the first derivative of the code with
respect to model parameters) of the physiological and energy balance
part of BETHY coupled with the adjoint of the atmospheric transport
model TM2 is used to optimise parameter values of BETHY. This is done
by assimilation of atmospheric CO2 concentration
measurements. Uncertainties of optimised model parameters can be derived
from the Hessian (the second derivative) of the BETHY code with respect
to the parameters. By using the Hessian of the BETHY code with respect
to the parameters, uncertainties of optimised model parameters can also
be derived. These uncertainties, that reflect both the prior
information (in a Bayesian context), as well as the information from the
large-scale inversion, can finally be translated into uncertainty
bounds for CO2 fluxes and any other model diagnostic. Both the
adjoint and Hessian codes are generated automatically using the
compiler tool TAF, developed by FastOpt. Automatic generation ensures
that improvements of BETHY can be used in the assimilation scheme
without delay.
First results with CCDAS using 20 years of
CO2 observation from the free atmosphere, while still
somewhat preliminary, clearly show that interannual fluctuations of
terrestrial CO2 fluxes are dominated by the El
Niño-Southern Oscillation (ENSO) cycle, except for the time after
the Pinatubo eruption (Scholze,
2003). During El Niño (warm) pacific conditions, large parts
of the tropical ecosystem come under water stress with reduced
photosynthesis (see Figure 5.6.1). Of the 58 parameters that enter the
optimisation, considerable reduction in uncertainty is found for about
12 (Figure 5.6.2). We find a terrestrial sink for Europe (excl. Russia)
that is around a third of the fossil fuel emissions of the area, but
with uncertainty bounds of the same size as the fluxes themselves. The
country analysed that has the largest uncertainty in terrestrial CO2
fluxes is Brazil, mainly because of the lack of observation stations in
that area (Scholze
et al., 2002, Figure 5.6.3).
Building on the experience gained with
CCDAS, CAMELS is currently working on a series of historical ecosystem
model simulations that span the entire 20th century and that
include further processes, such as land management and nitrogen
deposition. The final aim is to present a concept for an operational
system that is able to optimally combine all relevant large-scale
observations to deliver the best possible estimates of European and
global CO2 fluxes on a routine basis. Further information
about CAMELS is available form http://www.bgc-jena.mpg.de/public/carboeur/projects/camels.htm;
for CCDAS please check the website http://www.ccdas.org.
Members of the the CCDAS consortium are Marko Scholze, Wolfgang Knorr,
Heiner Widmann (Max-Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry, Jena), Peter
Rayner (CSIRO, Melbourne),Thomas Kaminski and Ralf Giering (FastOpt,
Hamburg).
Figure 5.6.1: Time series of global monthly fluxes
prognosed from CCDAS smoothed with a five month running mean filter,
after subtracting average seasonal cycle. Red/blue arrows: exception El
Niño/La Niña events, yellow arrow: Pinatubo eruption.
Figure 5.6.2: Reduction in uncertainty, expressed as 1-sprior/soptimized., for the 58 parameters of
BETHY used in CCDAS.
Figure 5.6.3: Estimated biosphere carbon sink strength
and associated uncertainties compared to fossil fuel and land use
emissions for 5 regions.
|